Comments on: Utilities for backing up client-side website data http://www.samurainet.org/blog/2008/05/16/utilities-for-backing-up-client-side-website-data/ "If you cut me, I bleed binary" Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:06:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: admin http://www.samurainet.org/blog/2008/05/16/utilities-for-backing-up-client-side-website-data/#comment-29 admin Sat, 24 May 2008 20:45:34 +0000 http://www.samurainet.org/blog/?p=22#comment-29 IE6 doesn't have this problem since it is simply "working offline." Therefore it still uses all the same links and paths, but just pulls from it's cache rather than from the web. IE6 doesn’t have this problem since it is simply “working offline.” Therefore it still uses all the same links and paths, but just pulls from it’s cache rather than from the web.

]]> By: Daniel Cousineau http://www.samurainet.org/blog/2008/05/16/utilities-for-backing-up-client-side-website-data/#comment-24 Daniel Cousineau Sun, 18 May 2008 02:04:47 +0000 http://www.samurainet.org/blog/?p=22#comment-24 You should also mention that Firefox actually restructures the links to point to a FILENAME_files/ directory that stores all the linked content (only the internal linked content) like CSS, JavaScript, Image, and Flash files. I don't know what IE 6 does but while wget has recursiveness, it doesn't restructure the links so you can't get the page to act normally without editing link targets like Firefox does. You should also mention that Firefox actually restructures the links to point to a FILENAME_files/ directory that stores all the linked content (only the internal linked content) like CSS, JavaScript, Image, and Flash files.

I don’t know what IE 6 does but while wget has recursiveness, it doesn’t restructure the links so you can’t get the page to act normally without editing link targets like Firefox does.

]]>